Home  ›  To What Does the Advent of Behavioral Modernity Refer?

To What Does the Advent of Behavioral Modernity Refer?

Written By sábado, 2 de abril de 2022 Add Comment Edit

Transition of human species to anthropologically modern behavior

Behavioral modernity is a suite of behavioral and cognitive traits that distinguishes electric current Homo sapiens from other anatomically modern humans, hominins, and primates.[1] Well-nigh scholars agree that modern homo behavior can exist characterized by abstract thinking, planning depth, symbolic beliefs (e.thousand., art, ornamentation), music and dance, exploitation of large game, and blade technology, among others.[2] [3] [ need quotation to verify ] Underlying these behaviors and technological innovations are cognitive and cultural foundations that accept been documented experimentally and ethnographically past evolutionary and cultural anthropologists. These human universal patterns include cumulative cultural adaptation, social norms, linguistic communication, and all-encompassing assist and cooperation beyond close kin.[4] [5]

Within the tradition of evolutionary anthropology and related disciplines, it has been argued that the development of these modern behavioral traits, in combination with the climatic atmospheric condition of the Last Glacial Flow and Last Glacial Maximum causing population bottlenecks, contributed to the evolutionary success of Human being sapiens worldwide relative to Neanderthals, Denisovans, and other archaic humans.[3] [6] [ demand quotation to verify ]

Arising from differences in the archaeological record, fence continues as to whether anatomically mod humans were behaviorally modern also. At that place are many theories on the development of behavioral modernity. These by and large fall into two camps: gradualist and cerebral approaches. The Later Upper Paleolithic Model theorises that modern human behavior arose through cognitive, genetic changes in Africa abruptly around 40,000–50,000 years agone effectually the time of the Out-of-Africa migration, prompting the movement of modern humans out of Africa and beyond the world.[7] Other models focus on how mod human being behavior may accept arisen through gradual steps, with the archaeological signatures of such behavior appearing only through demographic or subsistence-based changes. Many cite prove of behavioral modernity earlier (by at least about 150,000–75,000 years agone and possibly before) namely in the African Middle Rock Age.[8] [3] [ix] [10] [11] Emerge McBrearty and Alison South. Brooks are notable proponents of gradualism, challenging European-centric models by situating more change in the Middle Stone Historic period of African pre-history, though this version of the story is more difficult to develop in concrete terms due to a thinning fossil record as one goes further dorsum in fourth dimension.

Definition [edit]

To classify what should be included in modern human behavior, it is necessary to define behaviors that are universal among living human groups. Some examples of these human universals are abstruse idea, planning, trade, cooperative labor, body decoration, and the control and utilise of fire. Along with these traits, humans possess much reliance on social learning.[12] [13] This cumulative cultural change or cultural "ratchet" separates human culture from social learning in animals. Every bit well, a reliance on social learning may be responsible in part for humans' rapid adaptation to many environments outside of Africa. Since cultural universals are establish in all cultures including some of the nigh isolated indigenous groups, these traits must have evolved or have been invented in Africa prior to the exodus.[xiv] [fifteen] [16] [17]

Archaeologically, a number of empirical traits have been used equally indicators of modern man behavior. While these are oftentimes debated[18] a few are generally agreed upon. Archaeological evidence of behavioral modernity includes:[3] [7]

  • Burial
  • Fishing
  • Figurative art (cavern paintings, petroglyphs, dendroglyphs, figurines)
  • Systematic utilise of paint (such every bit ochre) and jewelry for decoration or self-ornamentation
  • Using bone fabric for tools
  • Ship of resources over long distances
  • Blade engineering
  • Diversity, standardization, and regionally distinct artifacts
  • Hearths
  • Composite tools

Critiques [edit]

Several critiques have been placed confronting the traditional concept of behavioral modernity, both methodologically and philosophically.[3] [18] Shea (2011) outlines a variety of bug with this concept, arguing instead for "behavioral variability", which, co-ordinate to the author, better describes the archaeological record. The use of trait lists, according to Shea (2011), runs the adventure of taphonomic bias, where some sites may yield more artifacts than others despite similar populations; as well, trait lists can be ambiguous in how behaviors may be empirically recognized in the archaeological record.[18] Shea (2011) in particular cautions that population pressure, cultural modify, or optimality models, similar those in human behavioral ecology, might better predict changes in tool types or subsistence strategies than a change from "archaic" to "modern" behavior.[18] Some researchers argue that a greater emphasis should be placed on identifying simply those artifacts which are unquestionably, or purely, symbolic equally a metric for modernistic human behavior.[3]

Theories and models [edit]

Late Upper Paleolithic Model or "Upper Paleolithic Revolution" [edit]

The Late Upper Paleolithic Model, or Upper Paleolithic Revolution, refers to the idea that, though anatomically modernistic humans offset appear around 150,000 years ago (as was once believed), they were non cognitively or behaviorally "modern" until around fifty,000 years ago, leading to their expansion out of Africa and into Europe and Asia.[7] [19] [20] These authors note that traits used as a metric for behavioral modernity exercise not appear as a package until around forty–fifty,000 years agone. Klein (1995) specifically describes evidence of fishing, bone shaped as a tool, hearths, significant artifact diversity, and elaborate graves are all absent before this point.[seven] [19] According to these authors, art merely becomes common beyond this switching point, signifying a change from archaic to modernistic humans.[seven] Nearly researchers debate that a neurological or genetic change, perhaps one enabling complex linguistic communication, such as FOXP2, caused this revolutionary alter in humans.[7] [twenty]

Alternative models [edit]

Contrasted with this view of a spontaneous spring in knowledge among aboriginal humans, some authors like Alison S. Brooks, primarily working in African archaeology, bespeak to the gradual aggregating of "modern" behaviors, starting well earlier the 50,000-yr benchmark of the Upper Paleolithic Revolution models.[viii] [3] [21] Howiesons Poort, Blombos, and other Due south African archaeological sites, for example, show testify of marine resources acquisition, trade, the making of bone tools, blade and microlith engineering, and abstract ornamentation at least by 80,000 years ago.[8] [ix] Given prove from Africa and the Middle East, a variety of hypotheses have been put forth to describe an earlier, gradual transition from simple to more complex human behavior. Some authors have pushed back the appearance of fully modern behavior to effectually 80,000 years agone or before in order to incorporate the South African information.[21]

Others focus on the slow accumulation of dissimilar technologies and behaviors across fourth dimension. These researchers describe how anatomically modern humans could have been cognitively the aforementioned, and what we define as behavioral modernity is simply the result of thousands of years of cultural adaptation and learning.[8] [iii] D'Errico and others have looked at Neanderthal culture, rather than early human being behavior exclusively, for clues into behavioral modernity.[six] Noting that Neanderthal assemblages often portray traits similar to those listed for modern human behavior, researchers stress that the foundations for behavioral modernity may in fact, lie deeper in our hominin ancestors.[22] If both mod humans and Neanderthals limited abstract art and complex tools then "modern human being behavior" cannot be a derived trait for our species. They argue that the original "human revolution" theory reflects a profound Eurocentric bias. Recent archaeological evidence, they argue, proves that humans evolving in Africa some 300,000 or fifty-fifty 400,000 years ago were already becoming cognitively and behaviourally "modern". These features include blade and microlithic engineering science, bone tools, increased geographic range, specialized hunting, the use of aquatic resources, long distance trade, systematic processing and use of pigment, and art and decoration. These items practice non occur suddenly together as predicted by the "human revolution" model, but at sites that are widely separated in space and time. This suggests a gradual assembling of the bundle of modern homo behaviours in Africa, and its later export to other regions of the Erstwhile World.

Between these extremes is the view – currently supported by archaeologists Chris Henshilwood,[23] Curtis Marean,[3] Ian Watts[24] and others – that there was indeed some kind of 'human being revolution' but that it occurred in Africa and spanned tens of thousands of years. The term "revolution" in this context would mean non a sudden mutation merely a historical development along the lines of "the industrial revolution" or "the Neolithic revolution".[25] In other words, it was a relatively accelerated procedure, too rapid for ordinary Darwinian "descent with modification" yet likewise gradual to be attributed to a single genetic or other sudden event. These archaeologists bespeak in particular to the relatively explosive emergence of ochre crayons and beat out necklaces, apparently used for corrective purposes. These archaeologists run into symbolic organisation of human social life as the key transition in modernistic homo evolution. Recently discovered at sites such as Blombos Cave and Meridian Point, Due south Africa, pierced shells, pigments and other striking signs of personal ornamentation have been dated within a fourth dimension-window of seventy,000–160,000 years ago in the African Middle Stone Historic period, suggesting that the emergence of Human being sapiens coincided, after all, with the transition to modern cognition and behaviour.[26] While viewing the emergence of language as a 'revolutionary' development, this school of thought generally attributes information technology to cumulative social, cerebral and cultural evolutionary processes as opposed to a single genetic mutation.[27]

A further view, taken by archaeologists such every bit Francesco D'Errico[22] and João Zilhão,[28] is a multi-species perspective arguing that evidence for symbolic civilisation in the form of utilised pigments and pierced shells are likewise found in Neanderthal sites, independently of any "modern" human influence.

Cultural evolutionary models may also shed light on why although evidence of behavioral modernity exists before 50,000 years ago, it is not expressed consistently until that point. With modest population sizes, human groups would have been affected by demographic and cultural evolutionary forces that may non take allowed for complex cultural traits.[ten] [11] [12] [xiii] Co-ordinate to some authors,[10] until population density became significantly high, complex traits could not have been maintained effectively. Some genetic testify supports a dramatic increase in population size earlier human migration out of Africa.[xx] High local extinction rates within a population too tin can significantly decrease the corporeality of diversity in neutral cultural traits, regardless of cognitive ability.[11]

Highly speculatively, bicameral listen theory argues for an additional, and cultural rather than genetic, shift from selfless to self-perceiving forms of human cognition and beliefs very tardily in homo history, in the Statuary Historic period. This is based on a literary analysis of Statuary Age texts which claims to show the first appearances of the concept of cocky around this fourth dimension, replacing the voices of gods every bit the primary form of recorded human cognition.[29] This not-mainstream theory is non widely accepted but does receive serious bookish involvement from time to time.[30]

Archaeological evidence [edit]

Africa [edit]

Research from 2017 indicates that Man sapiens originated in Africa betwixt around 350,000 and 260,000 years ago.[31] [32] [33] [34] There is some testify for the kickoff of modern behavior among early African H. sapiens effectually that menses.[35] [36] [37] [38]

Before the Out of Africa theory was generally accepted, at that place was no consensus on where the homo species evolved and, consequently, where modern human behavior arose. At present, notwithstanding, African archæology has become extremely important in discovering the origins of humanity. The first Cro-Magnon expansion into Europe around 48,000 years ago is more often than not accepted as already "modern",[nineteen] and it is at present by and large believed that behavioral modernity appeared in Africa before fifty,000 years agone, either significantly earlier, or possibly equally a late Upper Paleolithic "revolution" soon before which prompted migration out of Africa.

A multifariousness of prove of abstruse imagery, widened subsistence strategies, and other "modernistic" behaviors have been discovered in Africa, peculiarly South, North, and East Africa. The Blombos Cave site in South Africa, for example, is famous for rectangular slabs of ochre engraved with geometric designs. Using multiple dating techniques, the site was dated to be around 77,000 and 100,000 to 75,000 years old.[23] [39] Ostrich egg crush containers engraved with geometric designs dating to lx,000 years ago were institute at Diepkloof, S Africa.[40] Chaplet and other personal decoration have been plant from Kingdom of morocco which might be every bit much equally 130,000 years onetime; besides, the Cave of Hearths in South Africa has yielded a number of beads dating from significantly prior to fifty,000 years ago,[8] and beat out chaplet dating to about 75,000 years agone have been found at Blombos Cave, South Africa.[41] [42] [43]

Specialized projectile weapons besides have been institute at diverse sites in Heart Stone Age Africa, including bone and rock arrowheads at South African sites such as Sibudu Cave (forth with an early bone needle also found at Sibudu) dating approximately 72,000-lx,000 years ago[44] [45] [46] [47] [48] on some of which poisons may have been used,[49] and os harpoons at the Central African site of Katanda dating to about 90,000 years ago.[50] Bear witness likewise exists for the systematic estrus treating of silcrete stone to increment its flake-power for the purpose of toolmaking, beginning approximately 164,000 years agone at the South African site of Tiptop Indicate and becoming common there for the cosmos of microlithic tools at near 72,000 years ago.[51] [52]

In 2008, an ochre processing workshop likely for the production of paints was uncovered dating to c. 100,000 years agone at Blombos Cavern, Southward Africa. Analysis shows that a liquefied pigment-rich mixture was produced and stored in the two abalone shells, and that ochre, bone, charcoal, grindstones, and hammer-stones besides formed a blended part of the toolkits. Bear witness for the complexity of the task includes procuring and combining raw materials from diverse sources (implying they had a mental template of the process they would follow), possibly using pyrotechnology to facilitate fat extraction from bone, using a probable recipe to produce the compound, and the use of shell containers for mixing and storage for later utilise.[53] [54] [55] Modern behaviors, such as the making of shell chaplet, bone tools and arrows, and the use of ochre pigment, are evident at a Kenyan site by 78,000-67,000 years agone.[56] Testify of early stone-tipped projectile weapons (a feature tool of Homo sapiens), the stone tips of javelins or throwing spears, were discovered in 2013 at the Ethiopian site of Gademotta, and date to around 279,000 years ago.[35]

Expanding subsistence strategies beyond big-game hunting and the consequential diversity in tool types has been noted every bit signs of behavioral modernity. A number of South African sites take shown an early on reliance on aquatic resource from fish to shellfish. Pinnacle Point, in item, shows exploitation of marine resources as early every bit 120,000 years agone, perhaps in response to more than arid conditions inland.[9] Establishing a reliance on predictable shellfish deposits, for example, could reduce mobility and facilitate complex social systems and symbolic behavior. Blombos Cave and Site 440 in Sudan both show evidence of fishing every bit well. Taphonomic change in fish skeletons from Blombos Cavern have been interpreted as capture of live fish, clearly an intentional human beliefs.[8]

Humans in North Africa (Nazlet Sabaha, Arab republic of egypt) are known to have dabbled in chert mining, as early on as ≈100,000 years ago, for the construction of stone tools.[57] [58]

Evidence was establish in 2018, dating to almost 320,000 years ago, at the Kenyan site of Olorgesailie, of the early emergence of modern behaviors including: long-distance trade networks (involving goods such as obsidian), the use of pigments, and the possible making of projectile points. It is observed by the authors of three 2018 studies on the site that the show of these behaviors is approximately contemporary to the earliest known Man sapiens fossil remains from Africa (such as at Jebel Irhoud and Florisbad), and they propose that complex and mod behaviors had already begun in Africa around the time of the emergence of anatomically modern Homo sapiens.[36] [37] [38]

In 2019, farther evidence of early complex projectile weapons in Africa was found at Aduma, Ethiopia, dated 100,000-80,000 years agone, in the grade of points considered likely to vest to darts delivered past spear throwers.[59]

Olduvai Hominid 1 wore facial piercings.[60]

Europe [edit]

While traditionally described every bit evidence for the later Upper Paleolithic Model,[7] European archaeology has shown that the issue is more than circuitous. A diverseness of stone tool technologies are present at the fourth dimension of human being expansion into Europe and show evidence of modern behavior. Despite the problems of conflating specific tools with cultural groups, the Aurignacian tool complex, for example, is generally taken as a purely modern homo signature.[61] [62] The discovery of "transitional" complexes, like "proto-Aurignacian", have been taken every bit evidence of human groups progressing through "steps of innovation".[61] If, every bit this might suggest, man groups were already migrating into eastern Europe effectually 40,000 years and only later on show bear witness of behavioral modernity, so either the cerebral change must have diffused back into Africa or was already present earlier migration.

In low-cal of a growing torso of evidence of Neanderthal civilisation and tool complexes some researchers have put forth a "multiple species model" for behavioral modernity.[six] [22] [63] Neanderthals were oft cited as being an evolutionary expressionless-end, apish cousins who were less advanced than their human contemporaries. Personal ornaments were relegated as trinkets or poor imitations compared to the cave art produced past H. sapiens. Despite this, European bear witness has shown a variety of personal ornaments and artistic artifacts produced by Neanderthals; for case, the Neanderthal site of Grotte du Renne has produced grooved conduct, wolf, and play tricks incisors, ochre and other symbolic artifacts.[63] Although burials are few and controversial, there has been coexisting prove of Neanderthal ritual burials.[22] There are two options to describe this symbolic behavior among Neanderthals: they copied cultural traits from arriving modern humans or they had their own cultural traditions comparative with behavioral modernity. If they merely copied cultural traditions, which is debated by several authors,[6] [22] they even so possessed the capacity for circuitous culture described past behavioral modernity. As discussed above, if Neanderthals as well were "behaviorally modernistic" then it cannot exist a species-specific derived trait.

Asia [edit]

Near debates surrounding behavioral modernity have been focused on Africa or Europe only an increasing amount of focus has been placed on Eastward Asia. This region offers a unique opportunity to test hypotheses of multi-regionalism, replacement, and demographic effects.[64] Unlike Europe, where initial migration occurred around fifty,000 years agone, human remains accept been dated in Red china to effectually 100,000 years ago.[65] This early on evidence of human expansion calls into question behavioral modernity as an impetus for migration.

Rock tool engineering science is specially of interest in East asia. Post-obit Human erectus migrations out of Africa, Acheulean technology never seems to appear beyond present-day Republic of india and into China. Analogously, Mode 3, or Levallois technology, is non apparent in China following later hominin dispersals.[66] This lack of more than advanced engineering has been explained by serial founder furnishings and low population densities out of Africa.[67] Although tool complexes comparative to Europe are missing or bitty, other archaeological show shows behavioral modernity. For instance, the peopling of the Japanese archipelago offers an opportunity to investigate the early utilise of watercraft. Although ane site, Kanedori in Honshu, does suggest the use of watercraft as early on as 84,000 years agone, in that location is no other show of hominins in Japan until 50,000 years agone.[64]

The Zhoukoudian cave system near Beijing has been excavated since the 1930s and has yielded precious data on early human behavior in East asia. Although disputed, there is evidence of possible man burials and interred remains in the cavern dated to around 34-xx,000 years ago.[64] These remains have associated personal ornaments in the class of chaplet and worked shell, suggesting symbolic behavior. Forth with possible burials, numerous other symbolic objects like punctured creature teeth and beads, some dyed in blood-red ochre, have all been establish at Zhoukoudian.[64] Although fragmentary, the archaeological tape of eastern asia shows show of behavioral modernity before fifty,000 years ago merely, like the African record, it is not fully apparent until that fourth dimension.

Meet too [edit]

  • Archaic Homo sapiens
  • Blombos Cave
  • Cultural universal
  • Dawn of Humanity (film)
  • Evolution of human intelligence
  • Female person corrective coalitions
  • FOXP2 and human evolution
  • Man evolution
  • List of Stone Age art
  • Origin of language
  • Origins of society
  • Prehistoric art
  • Prehistoric music
  • Paleolithic religion
  • Contempo African origin
  • Sibudu Cave
  • Sociocultural evolution
  • Symbolism (disambiguation)
  • Symbolic culture
  • Timeline of evolution

References [edit]

  1. ^ Korisettar, Ravi (1998). Early Human being Behaviour in Global Context. Routledge.
  2. ^ McBrearty, Sally; Brooks, Allison (2000). "The revolution that wasn't: a new interpretation of the origin of mod homo behavior". Journal of Human Evolution. 39 (v): 453–563. doi:x.1006/jhev.2000.0435. PMID 11102266. Proponents of the model known as the 'human revolution' claim that modern human being behaviors arose suddenly, and most simultaneously, throughout the Old World ca. 40–50 ka. [...] In fact, many of the components of the 'human revolution' claimed to appear at twoscore–50 ka are institute in the African Heart Rock Age tens of thousands of years before. These features include blade and microlithic technology, bone tools, increased geographic range, specialized hunting, the employ of aquatic resources, long distance trade, systematic processing and use of pigment, and art and decoration.
  3. ^ a b c d e f g h i Henshilwood, Christopher; Marean, Curtis (2003). "The Origin of Mod Human Behavior: Critique of the Models and Their Test Implications". Electric current Anthropology. 44 (5): 627–651. doi:10.1086/377665. PMID 14971366. S2CID 11081605.
  4. ^ Loma, Kim; et al. (2009). "The Emergence of Human being Uniqueness: Characters Underlying Behavioral Modernity". Evolutionary Anthropology. 18 (v): 187–200. CiteSeerX10.i.one.469.5702. doi:x.1002/evan.20224. S2CID 56384790.
  5. ^ Klein, R. 1000. 1999. The homo career: human biological and cultural origins. Chicago: Academy of Chicago Press.
  6. ^ a b c d D'Errico, F; et al. (1998). "Neanderthal Acculturation in Western Europe? A Critical Review of the Prove and Its Interpretation". Electric current Anthropology. 39 (S1): S1–S44. doi:10.1086/204689. S2CID 144799519.
  7. ^ a b c d eastward f g Klein, Richard (1995). "Anatomy, behavior, and modern human origins". Journal of World Prehistory. 9 (two): 167–198. doi:10.1007/bf02221838. S2CID 10402296.
  8. ^ a b c d e f McBrearty, Emerge; Brooks, Allison (2000). "The revolution that wasn't: a new interpretation of the origin of modern human behavior". Journal of Human Evolution. 39 (5): 453–563. doi:x.1006/jhev.2000.0435. PMID 11102266.
  9. ^ a b c Marean, Curtis; et al. (2007). "Early human employ of marine resources and pigment in South Africa during the Centre Pleistocene". Nature. 449 (7164): 905–908. Bibcode:2007Natur.449..905M. doi:10.1038/nature06204. PMID 17943129. S2CID 4387442.
  10. ^ a b c Powell, Adam; et al. (2009). "Late Pleistocene Demography and the Advent of Mod Homo Behavior" (PDF). Scientific discipline. 324 (5932): 1298–1301. Bibcode:2009Sci...324.1298P. doi:ten.1126/scientific discipline.1170165. PMID 19498164. S2CID 206518315.
  11. ^ a b c Premo, Luke; Kuhn, Steve (2010). "Modeling Effects of Local Extinctions on Culture Change and Variety in the Paleolithic". PLOS ONE. 5 (12): e15582. Bibcode:2010PLoSO...515582P. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0015582. PMC3003693. PMID 21179418.
  12. ^ a b Boyd, Robert; Richerson, Peter (1988). Culture and the Evolutionary Process (two ed.). University of Chicago Printing. ISBN9780226069333.
  13. ^ a b Nakahashi, Wataru (2013). "Evolution of comeback and cumulative culture". Theoretical Population Biology. 83: 30–38. doi:ten.1016/j.tpb.2012.11.001. PMID 23153511.
  14. ^ Wade, Nicholas (July 15, 2003). "Early Voices: The Leap to Language". The New York Times. Archived from the original on September 18, 2018. Retrieved September 10, 2009.
  15. ^ Buller, David (2005). Adapting Minds: Evolutionary Psychology and the Persistent Quest for Human Nature . PMIT Press. p. 468. ISBN978-0-262-02579-9.
  16. ^ "lxxx,000-year-one-time Beads Shed Light on Early Culture". Livescience.com. June xviii, 2007. Retrieved September 10, 2009.
  17. ^ "iii distinct human populations". Accessexcellence.org. Retrieved September 10, 2009.
  18. ^ a b c d Shea, John (2011). "Human sapiens Is every bit Homo sapiens Was". Current Anthropology. 52 (ane): 1–35. doi:10.1086/658067. S2CID 142517998.
  19. ^ a b c Hoffecker, John (2009). "The spread of mod humans in Europe". PNAS. 106 (38): 16040–16045. Bibcode:2009PNAS..10616040H. doi:10.1073/pnas.0903446106. PMC2752585. PMID 19571003.
  20. ^ a b c Tattersall, Ian (2009). "Human origins: Out of Africa". PNAS. 106 (38): 16018–16021. Bibcode:2009PNAS..10616018T. doi:10.1073/pnas.0903207106. PMC2752574. PMID 19805256.
  21. ^ a b Foley, Robert; Lahr, Marta (1997). "Fashion iii Technologies and the Evolution of Modern Humans". Cambridge Archaeological Journal. 7 (1): 3–36. doi:ten.1017/s0959774300001451.
  22. ^ a b c d due east D'Errico, Francesco (2003). "The Invisible Frontier A Multiple Species Model for the Origin of Behavioral Modernity". Evolutionary Anthropology. 12 (iv): 188–202. doi:10.1002/evan.10113. S2CID 1904963.
  23. ^ a b Henshilwood, Christopher; et al. (2002). "Emergence of Mod Human being Behavior: Middle Stone Age Engravings from South Africa". Science. 295 (5558): 1278–1280. Bibcode:2002Sci...295.1278H. doi:10.1126/science.1067575. PMID 11786608. S2CID 31169551.
  24. ^ Watts, I. 2009. Ruby ochre, body painting, and linguistic communication: interpreting the Blombos ochre. In R. Botha and C. Knight (eds), The Cradle of Linguistic communication. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 62-92.
  25. ^ Mellars, P. A., Thou. Boyle, O. Bar-Yosef and C. Stringer (eds), 2007. Rethinking the Human Revolution: new behavioural and biological perspectives on the origin and dispersal of modern humans. Cambridge: McDonald Institute for Archaeological Research.
  26. ^ Henshilwood, C. S. and B. Dubreuil 2009. Reading the artifacts: gleaning language skills from the Centre Stone Age in Southern Africa. In R. Botha and C. Knight (eds), The Cradle of Language. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 41-61.
  27. ^ Botha, R. and C. Knight (eds), The Cradle of Language. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  28. ^ Zilhão, J (2006). "Neandertals and moderns mixed, and it matters". Evolutionary Anthropology. 15 (v): 183–195. doi:10.1002/evan.20110. S2CID 18565967.
  29. ^ Jaynes, Julian (2000) [1976]. The Origin of Consciousness in the Breakup of the Bicameral Mind. Houghton Mifflin. ISBN0-618-05707-2.
  30. ^ Damasio, Antonio (2010). Self Comes to Mind. New York: Pantheon Books. p. 289. ISBN978-0-307-37875-0. …I sympathize with Julian Jaynes's claim that something of great import may have happened to the human mind during the relatively cursory interval of fourth dimension between the events narrated in the Iliad and those that make upwardly the Odyssey.
  31. ^ Schlebusch, Carina M; Malmström, Helena; Günther, Torsten; Sjödin, Per; Coutinho, Alexandra; Edlund, Hanna; Munters, Arielle R; Vicente, Mário; Steyn, Maryna; Soodyall, Himla; Lombard, Marlize; Jakobsson, Mattias (2017). "Southern African ancient genomes estimate modernistic human deviation to 350,000 to 260,000 years ago". Scientific discipline. 358 (6363): 652–655. Bibcode:2017Sci...358..652S. doi:10.1126/scientific discipline.aao6266. PMID 28971970.
  32. ^ Sample, Ian (June 7, 2017). "Oldest Homo sapiens bones ever found shake foundations of the man story". The Guardian . Retrieved June seven, 2017.
  33. ^ Zimmer, Carl (September x, 2019). "Scientists Find the Skull of Humanity's Ancestor — on a Estimator - By comparing fossils and CT scans, researchers say they have reconstructed the skull of the last common forebear of modern humans". The New York Times . Retrieved September 10, 2019.
  34. ^ Mounier, Aurélien; Lahr, Marta (2019). "Deciphering African late eye Pleistocene hominin diversity and the origin of our species". Nature Communications. ten (1): 3406. Bibcode:2019NatCo..10.3406M. doi:10.1038/s41467-019-11213-w. PMC6736881. PMID 31506422.
  35. ^ a b Sahle, Y.; Hutchings, Westward. K.; Braun, D. R.; Sealy, J. C.; Morgan, L. E.; Negash, A.; Atnafu, B. (2013). Petraglia, Michael D (ed.). "Earliest Stone-Tipped Projectiles from the Ethiopian Rift Date to >279,000 Years Agone". PLOS ONE. 8 (11): e78092. Bibcode:2013PLoSO...878092S. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0078092. PMC3827237. PMID 24236011.
  36. ^ a b Chatterjee, Rhitu (March fifteen, 2018). "Scientists Are Amazed By Rock Age Tools They Dug Upward In Kenya". NPR . Retrieved March 15, 2018.
  37. ^ a b Yong, Ed (March fifteen, 2018). "A Cultural Leap at the Dawn of Humanity - New finds from Republic of kenya suggest that humans used long-altitude merchandise networks, sophisticated tools, and symbolic pigments right from the dawn of our species". The Atlantic . Retrieved March 15, 2018.
  38. ^ a b Brooks Every bit, Yellen JE, Potts R, Behrensmeyer AK, Deino AL, Leslie DE, Ambrose SH, Ferguson JR, d'Errico F, Zipkin AM, Whittaker Southward, Post J, Veatch EG, Foecke K, Clark JB (2018). "Long-distance stone transport and pigment utilize in the primeval Middle Stone Historic period". Scientific discipline. 360 (6384): 90–94. Bibcode:2018Sci...360...90B. doi:10.1126/science.aao2646. PMID 29545508.
  39. ^ Henshilwood, Christopher S.; d'Errico, Francesco; Watts, Ian (2009). "Engraved ochres from the Middle Stone Age levels at Blombos Cave, South Africa". Journal of Man Evolution. 57 (1): 27–47. doi:10.1016/j.jhevol.2009.01.005. PMID 19487016.
  40. ^ Texier, PJ; Porraz, 1000; Parkington, J; Rigaud, JP; Poggenpoel, C; Miller, C; Tribolo, C; Cartwright, C; Coudenneau, A; Klein, R; Steele, T; Verna, C (2010). "A Howiesons Poort tradition of engraving ostrich eggshell containers dated to 60,000 years ago at Diepkloof Stone Shelter, Southward Africa". Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 107 (14): 6180–6185. Bibcode:2010PNAS..107.6180T. doi:10.1073/pnas.0913047107. PMC2851956. PMID 20194764.
  41. ^ Henshilwood, Christopher S.; et al. (2004). "Middle Stone Age shell beads from Southward Africa". Scientific discipline. 304 (5669): 404. doi:ten.1126/science.1095905. PMID 15087540. S2CID 32356688.
  42. ^ d'Errico, Francesco; et al. (2005). "Nassarius kraussianus shell beads from Blombos Cave: evidence for symbolic behaviour in the Middle Stone Age". Journal of Human being Development. 48 (1): 3–24. doi:ten.1016/j.jhevol.2004.09.002. PMID 15656934.
  43. ^ Vanhaeren, Marian; et al. (2013). "Thinking strings: Boosted prove for personal ornament employ in the Middle Rock Historic period at Blombos Cave, Southward Africa". Journal of Human Evolution. 64 (vi): 500–517. doi:10.1016/j.jhevol.2013.02.001. PMID 23498114.
  44. ^ Backwell, L; d'Errico, F; Wadley, L (2008). "Heart Stone Age os tools from the Howiesons Poort layers, Sibudu Cave, Southward Africa". Journal of Archaeological Science. 35 (six): 1566–1580. doi:ten.1016/j.jas.2007.11.006.
  45. ^ Wadley, Lyn (2008). "The Howieson's Poort industry of Sibudu Cave". South African Archaeological Society Goodwin Serial. 10.
  46. ^ Lombard M, Phillips L (2010). "Indications of bow and rock-tipped arrow use 64,000 years ago in KwaZulu-Natal, Southward Africa". Antiquity. 84 (325): 635–648. doi:ten.1017/S0003598X00100134. S2CID 162438490.
  47. ^ Lombard M (2011). "Quartz-tipped arrows older than 60 ka: further use-trace evidence from Sibudu, Kwa-Zulu-Natal, South Africa". Periodical of Archaeological Science. 38 (8): 1918–1930. doi:10.1016/j.jas.2011.04.001.
  48. ^ Backwell, Fifty; Bradfield, J; Carlson, KJ; Jashashvili, T; Wadley, L; d'Errico, F (2018). "The antiquity of bow-and-arrow technology: evidence from Centre Stone Age layers at Sibudu Cavern". Journal of Archaeological Science. 92 (362): 289–303. doi:10.15184/aqy.2018.11.
  49. ^ Lombard Thousand (2020). "The tip cross-sectional areas of poisoned bone arrowheads from southern Africa". Periodical of Archaeological Science: Reports. 33: 102477. doi:10.1016/j.jasrep.2020.102477. S2CID 224889105.
  50. ^ Yellen, JE; AS Brooks; E Cornelissen; MJ Mehlman; K Stewart (April 28, 1995). "A eye stone age worked bone industry from Katanda, Upper Semliki Valley, Zaire". Science. 268 (5210): 553–556. Bibcode:1995Sci...268..553Y. doi:x.1126/science.7725100. PMID 7725100.
  51. ^ Brown, Kyle S.; Marean, Curtis W.; Herries, Andy I.R.; Jacobs, Zenobia; Tribolo, Chantal; Braun, David; Roberts, David Fifty.; Meyer, Michael C.; Bernatchez, J. (August 14, 2009), "Fire every bit an Engineering science Tool of Early on Modern Humans", Science, 325 (5942): 859–862, Bibcode:2009Sci...325..859B, doi:x.1126/science.1175028, hdl:11422/11102, PMID 19679810, S2CID 43916405
  52. ^ Brown, Kyle S.; Marean, Curtis West.; Jacobs, Zenobia; Schoville, Benjamin J.; Oestmo, Simen; Fisher, Erich C.; Bernatchez, Jocelyn; Karkanas, Panagiotis; Matthews, Thalassa (2012). "An early on and enduring advanced applied science originating 71,000 years agone in South Africa". Nature. 491 (7425): 590–3. Bibcode:2012Natur.491..590B. doi:10.1038/nature11660. PMID 23135405. S2CID 4323569.
  53. ^ Amos, Jonathan (October 13, 2011). "A Cultural Jump at the Dawn of Humanity - Ancient 'paint factory' unearthed". BBC News . Retrieved Oct thirteen, 2011.
  54. ^ Vastag, Brian (October 13, 2011). "Due south African cave yields paint from dawn of humanity". The Washington Postal service . Retrieved October 13, 2011.
  55. ^ Henshilwood, Christopher South.; et al. (2011). "A 100,000-Year-Onetime Ochre-Processing Workshop at Blombos Cave, S Africa". Science. 334 (6053): 219–222. Bibcode:2011Sci...334..219H. doi:10.1126/science.1211535. PMID 21998386. S2CID 40455940.
  56. ^ Shipton C, d'Errico F, Petraglia M, et al. (2018). 78,000-year-old record of Middle and Subsequently Rock Historic period innovation in an East African tropical forest. Nature Communications
  57. ^ "Archived copy". Archived from the original on January 5, 2019. Retrieved February 20, 2018. {{cite web}}: CS1 maint: archived copy equally title (link)
  58. ^ Guinness World Records (September 10, 2015). Guinness World Records 2016. Guinness Globe Records. p. 27. ISBN978-one-910561-03-4.
  59. ^ Sahle Y, Brooks AS (2019). "Cess of complex projectiles in the early Late Pleistocene at Aduma, Ethiopia". PLOS ONE. 14 (5): e0216716. Bibcode:2019PLoSO..1416716S. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0216716. PMC6508696. PMID 31071181.
  60. ^ Willman, J. C.; Hernando, R.; Matu, Chiliad.; Crevecoeur, I. (2020). "Biocultural diversity in Belatedly Pleistocene/Early Holocene Africa: Olduvai Hominid 1 (Tanzania) biological affinity and intentional torso modification" (PDF). American Journal of Physical Anthropology. 172 (4): 664–681. doi:10.1002/ajpa.24007. PMID 31944279. S2CID 210331198.
  61. ^ a b Joris, Olaf; Street, Martin (2008). "At the end of the 14C time scaledthe Middle to Upper Paleolithic tape of western Eurasia". Journal of Man Development. 55 (5): 782–802. doi:x.1016/j.jhevol.2008.04.002. PMID 18930513.
  62. ^ Anikovich, M.; et al. (2007). "Early Upper Paleolithic in Eastern Europe and Implications for the Dispersal of Modern Humans". Science. 315 (5809): 223–226. Bibcode:2007Sci...315..223A. doi:10.1126/science.1133376. PMID 17218523. S2CID 21428180.
  63. ^ a b Abadia, Oscar Moro; Gonzalez Morales, Manuel R. (2010). "Redefining Neanderthals and Art: An Alternative Interpretation of the Multiple Species Model for the Origin of Behavioural Modernity". Oxford Journal of Archaeology. 29 (3): 229–243. doi:10.1111/j.1468-0092.2010.00346.10.
  64. ^ a b c d Norton, Christopher; Jin, Jennie (2009). "The Development of Mod Human Behavior in Eastern asia: Current Perspectives". Evolutionary Anthropology. 18 (6): 247–260. doi:x.1002/evan.20235. S2CID 54836302.
  65. ^ Liu, Wu; et al. (2010). "Homo remains from Zhirendong, S China, and modern human being emergence in Eastern asia". PNAS. 107 (45): 19201–19206. Bibcode:2010PNAS..10719201L. doi:10.1073/pnas.1014386107. PMC2984215. PMID 20974952.
  66. ^ Norton, Christopher; Bae, 1000. (2008). "The Movius Line sensu lato (Norton et al. 2006) further assessed and defined". Journal of Human Development. 55 (6): 1148–1150. doi:10.1016/j.jhevol.2008.08.003. PMID 18809202.
  67. ^ Lycett, Stephen; Norton, Christopher (2010). "A demographic model for Palaeolithic technological evolution: The case of East asia and the Movius Line". 4th International. 211 (one–ii): 55–65. Bibcode:2010QuInt.211...55L. doi:10.1016/j.quaint.2008.12.001.

External links [edit]

  • Steven Mithen (1999), The Prehistory of the Mind: The Cognitive Origins of Art, Organized religion and Science, Thames & Hudson, ISBN 978-0-500-28100-0.
  • Artifacts in Africa Advise An Earlier Modern Human
  • Tools point to African origin for human behaviour
  • Key Human Traits Tied to Shellfish Remains, nytimes 2007/x/18
  • "Python Cave" Reveals Oldest Human Ritual, Scientists Propose
  • Human Timeline (Interactive) – Smithsonian, National Museum of Natural History (August 2016).

rossmanparm1978.blogspot.com

Source: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Behavioral_modernity

0 Response to "To What Does the Advent of Behavioral Modernity Refer?"

Postar um comentário

Assinar: Postar comentários (Atom)

Iklan Atas Artikel

Iklan Tengah Artikel 1

Iklan Tengah Artikel 2

Iklan Bawah Artikel